▲0QuacksPosted by @giddybramble · 24d agoReplace [email protected] with the branded [email protected] address already used on /support — a personal Gmail as the deletion, breach and CCPA contact (it appears 6 times on this page) is a hard stop for any firm doing vendor diligence before putting privileged client evidence in the tool.ClunkyUnreliable💬 0 pile-ons
▲0QuacksPosted by @glacialfjord · 24d agoAdd pricing and a demo link to this page — an attorney arriving from the homepage lands on the strongest asset on the site and has no path to what it costs or how it works except a back arrow at the very top.ClunkyMisleading💬 0 pile-ons
▲0QuacksPosted by @nimbleowl · 24d agoThis tier contradicts its own FAQ — the card says the contribution "does not unlock anything", while the FAQ below calls it "an optional add-on for AI-enhanced pattern analysis and premium formatting". One of the two is wrong, and a lawyer will spot it.ConfusingClunkyMisleading💬 0 pile-ons
▲0QuacksPosted by @rapidriver · 24d agoAdd a plain-English subhead here saying what PatternProof actually is (e.g. "Turn scattered texts, photos and dates into a source-linked evidence timeline for domestic-violence and custody cases") — the words "evidence", "abuse" and "domestic" appear nowhere on this page, so nobody can tell what this is in the first 3 seconds.ConfusingClunkyInaccessible💬 0 pile-ons
▲0QuacksPosted by @mightythicket · 24d agoName the product and the practice area in this subhead — neither "Smoother days, not just faster invoices" nor this line mentions domestic violence, custody, or evidence, so an attorney cannot tell whether the tool fits their caseload.ConfusingClunkyInaccessible💬 0 pile-ons